Skip to main content

Delhi's Air Quality Turns 'Very Poor' As People Burst Crackers Despite Ban

Delhi's Air Quality Turns 'Very Poor' As People Burst Crackers Despite Ban

Delhi's air quality turned "very poor" on Monday after the bursting of firecrackers on Diwali.

New Delhi:

 A large number of high-decibel firecrackers thundered throughout Diwali night on Monday as people in Delhi flouted the ban imposed on these by the city government.

Delhi Environment Minister Gopal Rai last week said bursting firecrackers in the national capital on Diwali will attract a jail term of up to six months and a fine of Rs 200.

Despite the legal deterrent in place, people in many parts of the city, including in south and northwest Delhi, started bursting crackers by dusk. High-intensity firecrackers could be heard going off on the ground or mid-air.

And, as the night progressed the intensity of firecrackers increased breaching permissible decibel limits, prompting some to wonder "if there was any ban at all".

Bursting of firecrackers on Diwali is an age-old tradition, but authorities in Delhi said the decision to restrict it was taken after considering environmental concerns and health hazards associated with it.

Delhi's air quality turned "very poor" on Monday amid an increase in stubble burning, bursting of firecrackers and moderately unfavourable meteorological conditions which allowed the accumulation of pollutants.

However, the 24-hour average air quality index (AQI) of 312 was still the second-best for Diwali in seven years. The city recorded an AQI of 281 on Diwali in 2018.

Earlier in the day, experts feared that if the volume of firecrackers burst goes up again this year, the air quality is likely to dip further.

In case firecrackers are burst like last year, the air quality may plunge to "severe" levels on the night of Diwali itself and continue to remain in the "red" zone for another day, the System of Air Quality and Weather Forecasting and Research (SAFAR) had earlier predicted.

Notwithstanding the ban, people burst firecrackers with impunity in various areas, starting around 6 pm.

In south Delhi's East of Kailash, and neighbouring places like Nehru Place and Moolchand, firecrackers going off mid-air could be heard in the evening. Some residents burst crackers in their neighbourhood like every year.

In Burari too, many residents burst firecrackers despite widespread dissemination of information about the ban.

"They are educated but still doing this, what will children learn from it," said a resident of a colony in Burari.

In Laxmi Nagar, Mayur Vihar and Shahdara in east Delhi, the situation was similar. While the intensity in the late evening was lower compared to last year, it rose after 9 pm.

"It was as if the slog overs have started," a Laxmi Nagar resident said.

Loud thuds of crackers were also reported in southwest Delhi's Munirka area.

Bipasha Ghosh, 19, who came to south Delhi's Kailash Hills area from Kolkata, a few days ago, said, "In my area, it went on past 11 pm. I wonder if there is a ban on bursting firecrackers in Delhi. Also, those doing it are irresponsible and insensitive to the environment and to people who have respiratory problems and other health issues".

Many people complained of itchy skin and a burning sensation in their eyes due to smoke from bursting firecrackers.

"I will not step out tomorrow, I know what the air quality will be tomorrow," said Reetu Nandan, a student, who lives in south Delhi.  Delhi Environment Minister Rai had earlier said production, storage and sale of firecrackers in the city will be punishable with a fine of up to Rs 5,000 and three years in jail under Section 9B of the Explosives Act.

A total of 408 teams had been set up to implement the ban.

The Delhi Police set up 210 teams under assistant commissioners of police, while the revenue department set up 165 teams and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee 33 teams.

In neighbouring cities of Gurugram and Faridabad too, many people burst firecrackers.

The air quality in Ghaziabad (301), Noida (303), Greater Noida (270), Gurugram (325) and Faridabad (256) was reported in the 'poor to very poor' category on Monday.

An AQI between zero and 50 is considered "good", 51 and 100 "satisfactory", 101 and 200 "moderate", 201 and 300 "poor", 301 and 400 "very poor", and 401 and 500 "severe".

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Adblock test (Why?)



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/qPom9lZ https://ift.tt/0J1BWso
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Republic Day Updates: Macron Chief Guest As Delhi Hosts Parade Amid Dense Fog

Adblock test (Why?) from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/yqj8XDV https://ift.tt/zHpGab4 via IFTTT

சிறந்த வார இறுதி வாய்ப்புகள் - 6 மலிவு, அமெரிக்க மற்றும் சர்வதேச இலக்குகள்

நீங்கள் ஒரு நீண்ட வார இறுதியில் வந்து அந்த கூடுதல் நாள் ஆஃப் பயன்படுத்தி கொள்ள விரும்பினால், ஏன் ஒரு சில நாட்களுக்கு ஒரு பயணம் போக கூடாது? ஆய்வு செய்ய காத்திருக்கும் பல இடங்களில் இருக்கும்போது வீட்டில் தங்கியிருப்பது என்ன? இந்த நாட்களில், பயணமானது முன்கூட்டியே திட்டமிடுவதைத் தடுக்காது. நீங்கள் இரண்டு அல்லது மூன்று நாள் பயணம் மிக எளிதாக எறியலாம். சில நிமிடங்களில் நீங்கள் நிமிர்ந்து நிற்க வேண்டும். நீ எங்கு செல்ல வேண்டும்? இங்கே சிறந்த வார இறுதியில் சில நேரங்களில் (உள்நாட்டு) சில: டஸ்கன், அரிசோனா நீங்கள் பாலைவன வெப்பத்தை உணரவில்லையென்றால், டஸ்கன் ஒரு நல்ல, மலிவு மிக்க இடம். சாகோரா தேசிய பூங்காவை பார்வையிட்டு, பரியோ ஹிஸ்டோரிக்கோவை சோதித்துப் பார்ப்பது போல வெளியில் செய்ய நிறைய இருக்கிறது. அரிசோனாவின் தலைநகரம் - சோனாரா பாலைவன அருங்காட்சியகம், இயற்கை தாவரங்களைக் காண இயற்கை தாவரங்கள் மற்றும் விலங்குகள் பார்க்க. இது $ 100 ஒரு இரவு கீழ் இந்த நகரத்தில் ஒரு நல்ல ஹோட்டல் கண்டுபிடிக்க மிகவும் எளிதானது. கன்சாஸ் சிட்டி, MO அமெரிக்காவின் நடுப்பகுதியில், கன்சாஸ் சிட்டி ஒரு வார விடுமுறைக்கு ஏராளமான பொழ

Donald Trump Ordered To Pay $83 Million To Writer In Defamation Case

Jury orders Trump to pay $83 million in damages for defamation, US media said. New York: Former US president Donald Trump was ordered Friday by a New York jury to pay $83 million in damages to writer E. Jean Carroll, whom he publicly insulted and called a liar for alleging that he sexually assaulted her. The jury reached its decision after slightly less than three hours of deliberations. Trump made multiple comments about Carroll while he was president, demeaning her in the wake of her allegation of a 1990s assault. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.) Adblock test (Why?) from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/JtoUewI https://ift.tt/rd1fq6b via IFTTT